Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages<123>
The Mech Mage Deck that has 85% win rate- LOW COST - A LOT OF IMAGES TO EXPLAIN
JoyAdmin
#24 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 1:12:29 PM(UTC)
Rank: Administration

Groups: Administrators
Posts: 4,847

Thanks: 805 times
Was thanked: 4539 time(s) in 1637 post(s)
A.I. calculate parameters are ignored if you're using silverfish.
smaster8
#21 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 2:11:03 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18
Location: california USA

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 3 post(s)
mrhands88;22228 wrote:
Unstable Portal is such a fun card. I got two legendaries.

Do you think other cards are okay with this deck to make the win rate higher?


I'm not sure, but I'm trying to get archmage antonidas. I keep trying to improve the deck, but the original design seems to be the best. :P
lolzpineapple
#25 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 2:30:07 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1

Same, i'm 2-10 so far. Rip.
I Watch the bot play, see a few not so good play.
I think bot is fine when most of the good player climb higher than rank 17 in the next week. For now, the bot will just get wrecked by good players.
SMPGaming
#26 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 2:54:50 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 7

Been using this deck today. Currently out of 14 Matches, 8 were wins.
Warlock seems to be giving this deck a few problems. Certainly Zoo / Handlock.
Here's a screenshot of the Deck Ratio's: http://prntscr.com/5nnl1t
Yoin
#28 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 3:29:44 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
Five games are not enough to get some conclusions. Sometimes with a deck which win rate is +70%, as for example my mage deck, I got up to 6-7 games lost in a row.
And we are starting a new season, so a lot of ppl are grinding ranks now and win is more difficult.
My Control rules: here.
SMPGaming
#27 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 6:08:03 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 7

SMPGaming;22248 wrote:
Been using this deck today. Currently out of 14 Matches, 8 were wins.
Warlock seems to be giving this deck a few problems. Certainly Zoo / Handlock.
Here's a screenshot of the Deck Ratio's: http://prntscr.com/5nnl1t

Going to leave mine going overnight.
Currently at 21 Wins out of 33 Matches. 63% roughly.
smaster8
#29 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 9:40:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18
Location: california USA

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 3 post(s)
What I've noticed is that because the new season just started, the difficulty of my opponents has increased. Therefore I'm not sure how well the deck will do for a while. I currently hold a 65% win rate with the bot, but I'm sure the win rate will go up with time :)
southernlawdog
#30 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 11:51:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 12
Location: USA

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 3 post(s)
29-20 59.2% here so far
Riven
#31 Posted : Saturday, January 3, 2015 7:14:49 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 12
Location: Toronto

Wouldn't flame strike be very useful?
Mitry
#23 Posted : Saturday, January 3, 2015 11:05:43 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 7

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
david420;22239 wrote:
Gave it a try can't say I had the same luck.
Using silverfish and both max calculate functions maxed.






mmm, something failed there :/
Chicken
#33 Posted : Saturday, January 3, 2015 2:02:23 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2
Location: Berlin

Thanks: 2 times


50% with this Deck - Europe Server
smaster8
#32 Posted : Saturday, January 3, 2015 5:23:45 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18
Location: california USA

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Riven;22273 wrote:
Wouldn't flame strike be very useful?


flame strike is a high cost card in a low cost deck. Ideally you would sub in antonidas and a couple of apprentices for the late game, but that costs and extra 1480 dust, doubling the cost of the deck.
987655mm
#34 Posted : Sunday, January 4, 2015 1:13:20 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8
Location: Germany

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Crafted a lot of cards for this deck with high expectations... and I must say... that I am very surprised that this deck is so good! Good job mate! I do not regret spending my dust on this deck. Heck, I might even play this deck as my main deck in ranked :) Thank you again!
omerhayyam
#35 Posted : Sunday, January 4, 2015 4:10:04 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
How you guys getting more then %40 winrate over 40 50 games i cant understand. Bot cant mulligan good and makes a lot of mistakes. Cant avoid aoe and fills the board with minions for a %100 lost game. Dont get me wrong, I'm glad we have a bot and ıt helps us but that %85 winrate doesnt make sense.

Playing EU atm and i know its new season and opponents will be worse in time but still bot has a lot of room for improvement. In fact this deck is doin bad in EU atm :( using silverfish btw.
Golddieb
#36 Posted : Sunday, January 4, 2015 5:03:06 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 147

Thanks: 39 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 38 post(s)
omerhayyam;22317 wrote:
How you guys getting more then %40 winrate over 40 50 games i cant understand. Bot cant mulligan good and makes a lot of mistakes. Cant avoid aoe and fills the board with minions for a %100 lost game. Dont get me wrong, I'm glad we have a bot and ıt helps us but that %85 winrate doesnt make sense.

Playing EU atm and i know its new season and opponents will be worse in time but still bot has a lot of room for improvement. In fact this deck is doin bad in EU atm :( using silverfish btw.


Are you botting on ranked? Don't do that in the first one or two weeks of a new season or you will end in almost every stream...

Switch to causual and try again.

If you look at the deck description from the link in the first post the creator says this deck should be played agressive and not play around aoe.
smaster8
#37 Posted : Sunday, January 4, 2015 5:26:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18
Location: california USA

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Golddieb;22318 wrote:
Are you botting on ranked? Don't do that in the first one or two weeks of a new season or you will end in almost every stream...

Switch to causual and try again.

If you look at the deck description from the link in the first post the creator says this deck should be played agressive and not play around aoe.



Well my deck that I use now is much different, I have antonidas and tbh he doesnt make that much of a difference. I personally think that this deck should be used for casual gold farming- that is the intention of the deck- low cost deck so you can make money lol. Now that I have most of the legendaries I just play ranked to climb.
987655mm
#38 Posted : Monday, January 5, 2015 8:02:14 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8
Location: Germany

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
smaster8;22319 wrote:
Well my deck that I use now is much different, I have antonidas and tbh he doesnt make that much of a difference. I personally think that this deck should be used for casual gold farming- that is the intention of the deck- low cost deck so you can make money lol. Now that I have most of the legendaries I just play ranked to climb.

But I must admit that this deck is actually pretty good. 20 wins 11 losses at mine in casual. Very decent for a cheap deck.
sn00zz
#39 Posted : Monday, January 5, 2015 2:03:20 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1
Location: Tartu

The deck is fine, but this silverfish.dll is fucking awful.. :D
It makes so many retarded mistakes.
smaster8
#40 Posted : Monday, January 5, 2015 3:19:41 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18
Location: california USA

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 3 post(s)
sn00zz;22354 wrote:
The deck is fine, but this silverfish.dll is fucking awful.. :D
It makes so many retarded mistakes.


yeah if anyone wants to create a custom rule set be my guest, I think it would help a lot. I tried but got bored XD.

check out this pack opening lol



JoyAdmin
#41 Posted : Tuesday, January 6, 2015 1:32:06 AM(UTC)
Rank: Administration

Groups: Administrators
Posts: 4,847

Thanks: 805 times
Was thanked: 4539 time(s) in 1637 post(s)
Cool ! Is it arena awarded pack ?

I got a golden legendary card too in arena awarded pack.
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.805 seconds.