Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
7 Pages<1234>»
Silverfish a generic set of rules (_mulligan.txt & _combo.txt)
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
BlackOak
#26 Posted : Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:07:51 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Dre;30009 wrote:
I'am wondering, say like you want to play secretpaladin and you use the _mulligan.txt how does the bot know if it needs to read the paladin (all) part or the secredin part. Or do you need to delete everything exept the part of the mulligan you want for the deck you want to play?

The rules are designed to be generic. But certain deck types have key cards just for that type of deck others are standard across all decks like "Zombie Chow" or "Leper Gnome" so are safe to load for all decks.
Of course you do what you like delete lines or post here if you don't agree with them and I'll do more research.
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#28 Posted : Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:08:54 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
godshades;30013 wrote:
hi, can u add a combo for equality + Consecration

I can have a look, if it's being misplayed by silverfish
Back to top
WWW
Dre
#30 Posted : Sunday, September 27, 2015 2:02:47 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
Are combo's like, knife juggler + mustar (pally) and knife juggler + imposion (zoolock) and knife juggler + unleash the hounds (hunter)

allready played right in silverfish or do these need to be programmed in _combo.txt aswell?
Back to top
WWW
gatomiaurex
#31 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 3:45:56 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 140

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 15 post(s)
I mixed Emilcoff's and Blackoak's deck rules for the secret paladin deck, does this work? Or will the first rules will override the class rules?

Quote:

// ==============================================
// P A L A D I N
// == Secret Paladin ==
// vs All
// 1 x Knife Juggler (NEW1_019)
hold;pala;all;NEW1_019:1
// 1 x Noble Sacrifice (EX1_130) + Secretkeeper (EX1_080)
hold;pala;all;EX1_130:1:EX1_080
// 1 x Muster for Battle (GVG_061)
hold;pala;all;GVG_061:1
// Secretkeeper (EX1_080)
hold;pala;all;EX1_080
// Shielded Minibot (GVG_058)
hold;pala;all;GVG_058

//vs lock consecration, secretkeeper, minibot
hold;pala;warlock;CS2_093:1,EX1_080,GVG_058

//vs hunter consecration, secretkeeper, minibot
hold;pala;hunter;CS2_093:1,EX1_080,GVG_058

//vs pala consecration, secretkeeper, minibot
hold;pala;pala;CS2_093:1,EX1_080,GVG_058

//vs warrior secretkeeper, minibot, knifejuggler
hold;pala;warrior;EX1_080,GVG_058,NEW1_019

//vs mage secretkeeper, minibot, knifejuggler
hold;pala;mage;EX1_080,GVG_058,NEW1_019

//vs druid secretkeeper, minibot, knifejuggler
hold;pala;druid;EX1_080,GVG_058,NEW1_019

//vs thief secretkeeper, minibot, knifejuggler
hold;pala;thief;EX1_080,GVG_058,NEW1_019

//vs priest secretkeeper, minibot, knifejuggler
hold;pala;priest;EX1_080,GVG_058,NEW1_019

//vs shaman secretkeeper, minibot, knifejuggler
hold;pala;shaman;EX1_080,GVG_058,NEW1_019


The combo section might need some other combos like

Quote:
Warrior


Attack with Fiery War Axe a 4 health minion + Cruel Taskmaster (which the bot seems to do backwards)
Shield Slam / Shield Maiden / Bash + Slam (dunno if the bot still uses slam without having armor, it used to do it)
Cruel Taskmaster + Execute
Bash + Execute
Slam + Execute


Quote:
Warlock


Minion + Power Overwhelming + Shadowflame (zoo)


Quote:
Mage


Flamewaker + Spare Parts / Arcane missiles / Mirror Image (dunno if the bot already does it, haven't tried it)
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
franner
#33 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 4:04:08 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116
Location: Denmark

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Thanks for your great work.

It is nice to see improvements and sharing it.

I was thinking if you are planning on a mulligan section for the warrior class?
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#34 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 4:18:29 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
franner;30052 wrote:
Thanks for your great work.

It is nice to see improvements and sharing it.

I was thinking if you are planning on a mulligan section for the warrior class?
Thanks, yeah sure I'm going to try and cover all classes and styles of play. If you have and mulligan suggestions I'll be happy to include them :)
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#29 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 4:52:04 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
godshades;30013 wrote:
hi, can u add a combo for equality + Consecration

Added, can you keep an eye on it? I might have to tweak it a little.
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#32 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 4:55:16 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
gatomiaurex;30051 wrote:
I mixed Emilcoff's and Blackoak's deck rules for the secret paladin deck, does this work? Or will the first rules will override the class rules?
Yes they will :/
Back to top
WWW
Miscellaneous
#35 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 6:16:17 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 14

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Did the Bot know Harrison or Ooz + Enemy Weapon?

and

Rouge:
Prep + Sprint?

Bladefurry + Deadly Poison or Oil
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Dre
#37 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 7:08:37 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
Combo.txt says:

// W A R R I O R
// Equality (EX1_619) + Consecration (CS2_093)
EX1_619,5;CS2_093,0;bonus:5

Not that it changes the way of playing for the bot but its P A L A D I N who has those spells ;)
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#38 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 8:10:19 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Dre;30062 wrote:
Combo.txt says:

// W A R R I O R
// Equality (EX1_619) + Consecration (CS2_093)
EX1_619,5;CS2_093,0;bonus:5

Not that it changes the way of playing for the bot but its P A L A D I N who has those spells ;)
oops! thanks :)
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#36 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 8:13:16 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Miscellaneous;30061 wrote:
Did the Bot know Harrison or Ooz + Enemy Weapon?

and

Rouge:
Prep + Sprint?

Bladefurry + Deadly Poison or Oil
My limited understanding of _combo.txt is that it's only for card play and not for board conditions. If you have seen the bot miss play prep, sprint, bladefurry etc then I can add them :)
Back to top
WWW
mesusiveva
#39 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 11:10:55 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 33

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
how use this? only make this files and copy to folder ..\ExternBot\silverfish ?
no need change in settings.txt?
Back to top
WWW
franner
#40 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 2:10:56 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116
Location: Denmark

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 25 post(s)
This is going to be a long post. I think this might be useful for the warrior muligan and combo. I haven't read into how exactly you write the code or if its possible but here goes my suggestion:

Muligan ALL:
harrison jones, acidic swamp ooze (1) vs. weapon classes (warrior, paladin, hunter, shaman, rogue) (only keep 1, if got both, keep ooze)
kezan mystic vs. all secret classes (hunter, mage, paladin)

vs. mage, rouge
loatheb?


Mulligan warrior:
Keep Armorsmith vs. aggressive decks (hunter, paladin?)

Vs. Mage and warlock:
Fiery War Axe (up to 2), Armorsmith (1), Shield Slam (1), Acolyte of Pain (1) and Whirlwind (1).

Vs. Paladin:
Whirlwind (up to 2), Acolyte of Pain (1), Armorsmith (1) and Fiery War Axe (1)

Vs. Druid:
Execute, Fiery War Axe, Shield Slam

Vs. Rogue, Warrior and Hunter:
Fiery War Axe (2), Acolyte of Pain (1), Cruel Taskmaster (2)

Vs. Priest:
Acolyte of Pain (1) and an Armorsmith (1), Execute (2)

Vs. Shaman:
Fiery War Axe (2), Acolyte of Pain (1)

Combo:
shield block + shield slam
shield maiden + shield slam
bash + shield slam
Gommash hellscream + whirlwind
Gommash hellscream + revenge
death’s bite (deathrattle) + Gommash hellscream
Gommash hellscream + inner rage
Gommash hellscream + cruel taskmaster
death’s bite (deathrattle) + acolyte of pain
acolyte of pain + cruel taskmaster
sylvanas + Brawl
cruel taskmaster + execute
cruel taskmaster + big game hunter (if enemy minion has 5+ attack)
whirlwind + execute
Armorsmith + whirlwind – especially if you have multiple minions yourself
Armorsmith + minions attack enemy to get armor + shield slam (in case you haven’t got enouth armor)
Warsong commander + Grim patron (attack <3 attack to multiply patron, might fill board)
Warsong commander + frothing berserker (especially before you attack this round, best use if you have many minions on board)
Grim patron + cruel taskmaster
Grim patron + whirlwind
Grim patron + inner rage
Multiple damaged minions – battle rage
Grim patron + revenge (if more than 12 life)

Warsong commander + Grim patron + commanding shout, attack all minions to fill board if no lethal.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
BlackOak
#41 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 8:08:49 PM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
franner;30075 wrote:
This is going to be a long post. I think this might be useful for the warrior muligan and combo. I haven't read into how exactly you write the code or if its possible but here goes my suggestion.....

Silverfish misplays all of those?
Back to top
WWW
gatomiaurex
#42 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 8:36:50 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 140

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 15 post(s)
He is asking you to write those mulligan rules and combos.
Back to top
WWW
BlackOak
#43 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 8:41:15 PM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
gatomiaurex;30089 wrote:
He is asking you to write those mulligan rules and combos.
As I have said in my 2nd post _combo.txt should only contain fixes for silverfish misplays.
Back to top
WWW
franner
#44 Posted : Monday, September 28, 2015 9:44:47 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116
Location: Denmark

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 32 time(s) in 25 post(s)
The combos I am not sure if it play's them all as there are cards I actually do not have yet, like gommash and sylvanas so cannot test those (but I have seen these combos alot when playing against other warriors). I don't play patron warrior at the moment either but I took them as combo as its a much played deck by some warriors and had much success before tgt dunno how it works with this meta.

I was just writing the combos I know works together but haven't had too much time to follow the bot while playing lately (working most of the day, so haven't too much time at the moment :( ), so cannot say if the bot plays these correctly or needs adjusting. But the mulligan part should be good I think.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
BlackOak
#45 Posted : Tuesday, September 29, 2015 5:23:57 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
franner;30091 wrote:
The combos I am not sure if it play's them all as there are cards I actually do not have yet, like gommash and sylvanas so cannot test those (but I have seen these combos alot when playing against other warriors). I don't play patron warrior at the moment either but I took them as combo as its a much played deck by some warriors and had much success before tgt dunno how it works with this meta.

I was just writing the combos I know works together but haven't had too much time to follow the bot while playing lately (working most of the day, so haven't too much time at the moment :( ), so cannot say if the bot plays these correctly or needs adjusting. But the mulligan part should be good I think.
I did add warrior mulligan yesterday, and spent a lot of my day trying to get combo's for patron setup. But even with very basic bot setting my PC isn't powerful enough to calculate the patron combo before the rope times out :/
It will be something I revisit once I purchase a new PC.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked BlackOak for this useful post.
franner on 9/29/2015(UTC)
Oridian
#47 Posted : Tuesday, September 29, 2015 5:29:29 AM(UTC)
Oridian

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 7 times
BlackOak;30106 wrote:
But even with very basic bot setting my PC isn't powerful enough to calculate the patron combo before the rope times out :/
It will be something I revisit once I purchase a new PC.

If you ever want me to test for you man, I got a kickass PC with high specs
Back to top
WWW
7 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.400 seconds.