Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

4 Pages123>»
Spyscouter's SpitefulDruid Deck
spyscouter
#1 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 2:23:06 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Hey guys, I made a basic config for spiteful druid and it was 33-0 overnight casual concede, and is now 42-2 (96%). I think it has potential in ranked but I wanted to fine tune it some more first.

I am looking for some people to test it out and report back misplays. I know there is definitely room for improvement.

Thanks,
spyscouter

SPITEFUL DRUID V1.2 (4/22/18)
10 users thanked spyscouter for this useful post.
paco33 on 4/21/2018(UTC), 0verfl0w on 4/21/2018(UTC), botpowers on 4/22/2018(UTC), narutodiablo on 4/23/2018(UTC), Cloud on 5/4/2018(UTC), NightyBot on 5/15/2018(UTC), allhearth001 on 5/16/2018(UTC), zpalas on 5/17/2018(UTC), Sunblood on 5/17/2018(UTC), snowbunny on 5/17/2018(UTC)
henktencate
#2 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 2:50:46 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 15

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Thanks for the config, testing right now. I'll post results and misplays tonight.
paco33
#3 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 3:00:38 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 48

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
spyscouter;55947 wrote:
Hey guys, I made a basic config for spiteful druid and it was 33-0 overnight casual concede, and is now 42-2 (96%). I think it has potential in ranked but I wanted to fine tune it some more first.

I am looking for some people to test it out and report back misplays. I know there is definitely room for improvement.

Here is the SpitefulDruid config.

I've never used github so let me know if the link does not work correctly.

Thanks,
spyscouter



ty so much dude! appreciated

testing now
henktencate
#4 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 3:04:51 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 15

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
- played MCT without 4 enemy minions, even though there were other 3-drops available.
- bot chose poisonous spiders over taunt scarabs even though that gave opponent lethal.
- bot played grand archivist even though both UI's were in hand and 10 mana was available.
1 user thanked henktencate for this useful post.
paco33 on 4/21/2018(UTC)
paco33
#5 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 3:54:50 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 48

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
henktencate;55951 wrote:
- played MCT without 4 enemy minions, even though there were other 3-drops available.
- bot chose poisonous spiders over taunt scarabs even though that gave opponent lethal.
- bot played grand archivist even though both UI's were in hand and 10 mana was available.


What good replacement for MCT are there? I notice it doesnt work well or maybe a better card to fit its place. 2x MCT seems too much. Maybe keep 1 and replace 1 with something?
spyscouter
#7 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 4:26:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Later if I have time I’ll hard code the bot to pick 1/5 taunts all the time.

Also, I’ll change MC so that if there are 3 enemy minions to not play it, and give large bonus if there are 4.

The MCT are for playing against aggro. Otherwise it’s hard to keep up.

Thanks for the feedback guys keep em coming!
1 user thanked spyscouter for this useful post.
paco33 on 4/21/2018(UTC)
spyscouter
#6 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 4:28:08 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
paco33;55952 wrote:
What good replacement for MCT are there? I notice it doesnt work well or maybe a better card to fit its place. 2x MCT seems too much. Maybe keep 1 and replace 1 with something?


There is already code to give negative bonus to Grand Arch if no spells in deck but I’ll look into it more.

1 user thanked spyscouter for this useful post.
paco33 on 4/21/2018(UTC)
0verfl0w
#8 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 8:06:36 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 4 times
Testing your config .... I will post results

Thanks for your efford !
spyscouter
#9 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 8:19:35 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Any early results? I’m eager. Ha
paco33
#10 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 9:18:10 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 48

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
spyscouter;55957 wrote:
Any early results? I’m eager. Ha



26-0

bout to try on rank 5 na
spyscouter
#11 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 10:00:02 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
paco33;55958 wrote:
26-0

bout to try on rank 5 na



I’d be happy with 40-45% win rate at rank 5. Probably won’t be that high though lol.

What’s the meta like up there?
kamil234
#12 Posted : Saturday, April 21, 2018 11:06:43 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 20 post(s)
spyscouter;55959 wrote:
I’d be happy with 40-45% win rate at rank 5. Probably won’t be that high though lol.

What’s the meta like up there?


face mage, taunt druid, cube lock, even paladin
0verfl0w
#13 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 6:34:42 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 4 times
Here are the results :



Tested on rank EU , and stuck on level 10. It does reach level 9 at peak, but i dont think it can reach level 10 alone
spyscouter
#14 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 7:32:47 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Will you moniter and see if the bot is roping? I managed 18-18 overnight on US starting at rank 9. Good matchups were warlock and druid suprisingly. And there are a lot of them higher up so it has potential. Hopefully I can make some tweaks today and release version 1.2 and try again overnight.

I finished in rank 8 due to win streaking.
0verfl0w
#15 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 8:55:48 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 4 times
spyscouter;55968 wrote:
Will you moniter and see if the bot is roping? I managed 18-18 overnight on US starting at rank 9. Good matchups were warlock and druid suprisingly. And there are a lot of them higher up so it has potential. Hopefully I can make some tweaks today and release version 1.2 and try again overnight.

I finished in rank 8 due to win streaking.


I were not monitoring all time, but no roping, even with board full of minions... Maybe, EU server?
I'm not expert, but I've seen no big misplays, some of the games were lost by a very tiny diference in hero points and others after almost 20 turns !

Sadly, I cannot say what to improve, but keep testing all your changes.

Thanks pal !
kamil234
#16 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 10:49:58 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 20 post(s)
i might give this a test later, sadly i am missing the most expensive cards (malfurion, and spiteful). So I will have to craft them
spyscouter
#17 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 11:29:34 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
kamil234;55973 wrote:
i might give this a test later, sadly i am missing the most expensive cards (malfurion, and spiteful). So I will have to craft them


For farming you don’t need malfurion. For ranked I’d say he is critical in winning the late game.

I updated the config on my local copy. I’ll update the original post later after some verifications.
spyscouter
#19 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 12:55:26 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Updated Original Post. Please let me know what you guys think. For MC tech I gave it a negative bonus if the enemy had 3 minions on board...this may be a mistake but I figured wait until you have 4 to play it, or play it with 0,1 or 2 enemy minions on board.

If you think that is a bad idea just delete the EX1_085.json file out of the config.

Please share results!
paco33
#22 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:10:49 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 48

Thanks: 9 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
spyscouter;55978 wrote:
Updated Original Post. Please let me know what you guys think. For MC tech I gave it a negative bonus if the enemy had 3 minions on board...this may be a mistake but I figured wait until you have 4 to play it, or play it with 0,1 or 2 enemy minions on board.

If you think that is a bad idea just delete the EX1_085.json file out of the config.

Please share results!


ill post rank 5 na results soon. What all was changed besides mct in the new version?

Im really digging this deck, it cant break rank 4 na but its still smashing people
0verfl0w
#20 Posted : Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:26:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 4 times
spyscouter;55978 wrote:
Updated Original Post. Please let me know what you guys think. For MC tech I gave it a negative bonus if the enemy had 3 minions on board...this may be a mistake but I figured wait until you have 4 to play it, or play it with 0,1 or 2 enemy minions on board.

If you think that is a bad idea just delete the EX1_085.json file out of the config.

Please share results!


Testing testing... i'll post result in a couple of hours...
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.120 seconds.