Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

68 Pages«<23456>»
scottbreak's Meta Decks for Vision AI
fkeh
#66 Posted : Wednesday, April 19, 2017 5:59:30 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 55
Location: brasil

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
I only have to copy the topic texts and paste in the "warrior_pirate" folder in the files due?
bobhelmut
#67 Posted : Wednesday, April 19, 2017 8:38:38 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 28
Man
Location: USA

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Alright so over 11 games (a small sample size, I know, sorry) I'm getting a 45% win rate in ranks 8-10 NA /:
spyscouter
#68 Posted : Wednesday, April 19, 2017 9:41:33 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Testing pirate warrior now. Thanks Scott! I want to be more active in this thread. Any decks that need testing? I'll post results!
scottbreak
#69 Posted : Wednesday, April 19, 2017 11:14:31 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Added Midrange Hunter and Aggro Druid files. Please test and post results.
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
mary7 on 4/20/2017(UTC)
Kurtka
#70 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:21:04 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 72

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 19 post(s)
To be honest i think that no-Runt version of pirate warrior is better. Deck have enough early game as is and mortal strike is a finisher this decks needs against a wall of taunts ladder have become.

Will be testing taunt war now and will make a paladin version of Stonehill Defender's discovery for midrange paladin. Vision AI seems to work best with more of a control type of decks.
1 user thanked Kurtka for this useful post.
MarinoBog on 4/20/2017(UTC)
itzlolo
#72 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:30:34 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

Thanks: 1 times
hi i made a folder for the midrange hunter and copied the standard globlavalues json and made a mulligan file in which i copied the ones from here, but when loading hearthranger it says "no local mulligan settings! Use server Mulligan"
what am i doing wrong?
buldozer
#73 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:51:49 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

will you spread the deck for ranked play?
scottbreak
#71 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:35:02 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Kurtka;48254 wrote:
To be honest i think that no-Runt version of pirate warrior is better. Deck have enough early game as is and mortal strike is a finisher this decks needs against a wall of taunts ladder have become.

Will be testing taunt war now and will make a paladin version of Stonehill Defender's discovery for midrange paladin. Vision AI seems to work best with more of a control type of decks.

Agreed. I added the Runt to the Mulligan so that if people wanted to use them, they could. However, the Decklist is still the original one I posted, because it had a better win rate.
scottbreak
#74 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:36:33 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
buldozer;48260 wrote:
will you spread the deck for ranked play?

I don't understand what you are asking...can you explain?
80705472@qq.com
#78 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:38:28 AM(UTC)
80705472@qq.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 17

Thanks: 13 times
thank you for your work
charis2324
#79 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:50:21 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 76
Location: Hong Kong

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 20 post(s)
I'm using scottbeak's mid range hunter but the winrate is not great at all.

I think I got the files right.

Do anyone have any ideas?

My PC's spec:
I7 7700
8 GB Ram
erikuribe86
#80 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:27:06 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 14

Thanks: 22 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Well, after all I just decided to change to Vision AI. I started to use the Taunt Warrior deck with the respective .json files, but now the problem is that the bot is always mulligan the quest away!! What could be wrong? Also, I have noticed that, well, I am not a tech guy, but in the original json files exist indents in almost all the paragraphs and when you copy/paste the text from Scott now all the text is aligned to the left!! Is that correct? Maybe that´s why many people is having very low winrates with the Vision AI, and the problem resides in how we are creating the json files.
hitmank
#81 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:44:59 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
erikuribe86;48273 wrote:
Well, after all I just decided to change to Vision AI. I started to use the Taunt Warrior deck with the respective .json files, but now the problem is that the bot is always mulligan the quest away!! What could be wrong? Also, I have noticed that, well, I am not a tech guy, but in the original json files exist indents in almost all the paragraphs and when you copy/paste the text from Scott now all the text is aligned to the left!! Is that correct? Maybe that´s why many people is having very low winrates with the Vision AI, and the problem resides in how we are creating the json files.


If you look at the mulligan file he doesnt keep the quest against all classes:
"comment": "hold Fier Plume's Heart (UNG_934) when opponent is druid or mage or paladin or priest or shaman or warrior",
1 user thanked hitmank for this useful post.
scottbreak on 4/20/2017(UTC)
Davros404
#82 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:55:58 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 6

Thanks: 3 times





For 2 Day's. Thanks, nice deck for farm daily.
buldozer
#75 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:59:03 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

scottbreak;48266 wrote:
I don't understand what you are asking...can you explain?

You have deck for play ranked wild or standart?
scottbreak
#76 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:21:55 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
buldozer;48276 wrote:
You have deck for play ranked wild or standart?

You can run these files in Standard, and report back the results here, and report misplays to the Debug Tool. The more information I have about how the decks are preforming, and Joy has about misplays, the better the results will get. However, as I said in the OP, my goal with these decks is to farm gold and portraits.
NightlyKnight
#77 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:27:14 AM(UTC)
NightlyKnight


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 44
Man
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 53 time(s) in 13 post(s)
I can't believe what this midrange hunter can do !!! This is for less then 3 hours on casual ... AMAZING

wow
1 user thanked NightlyKnight for this useful post.
scottbreak on 4/20/2017(UTC)
qwertyalp1020
#83 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 1:58:42 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8

Thanks: 2 times
so do i create a new folder named taunt warrior inside CustomConfig and drag&drop those 4 files?
Elekid
#84 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:32:12 PM(UTC)
Elekid


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 101
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Thanks: 29 times
Was thanked: 65 time(s) in 58 post(s)
Both on Ranked Standard, hovering in Rank 15

Both on Ranked Standard, hovering in Rank 15
1 user thanked Elekid for this useful post.
scottbreak on 4/20/2017(UTC)
DarkFennec
#46 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:43:48 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 90

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
if i'm right, this mean we can make multiple folders with multiple deck_name_config.ini for each deck we want to run?

JoyAdmin;48190 wrote:
4. read file named [deck_config.ini] to know how to specify which config dir should be used on which deck, that's all.

68 Pages«<23456>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.224 seconds.