Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Hunter Midrange +75% WR
gozadera
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:17:04 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 13
Location: spain

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hi guys!

This deck is perfect, Im using it to farm gold hunter, but I think it can be a good deck until rank 5, perhaps more.

Hunter midrange

Winrate

Greetings.
3 users thanked gozadera for this useful post.
marcos0100 on 11/4/2015(UTC), Carlines on 11/5/2015(UTC), Gaostics on 11/10/2015(UTC)
raul199415
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:31:29 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1
Location: Barcelona

with what settings silverfish or rush/face defult?
gozadera
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:44:20 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 13
Location: spain

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 1 post(s)
raul199415;32060 wrote:
with what settings silverfish or rush/face defult?


Default (control)
emilcoff
#4 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 1:21:08 PM(UTC)
emilcoff


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116
Location: Argentina

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 10 post(s)
You are ccing at rank 19 ?
gozadera
#5 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 1:28:04 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 13
Location: spain

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 1 post(s)
emilcoff;32073 wrote:
You are ccing at rank 19 ?


Yep, at 18.
BlackOak
#6 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 1:29:59 PM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
gozadera;32059 wrote:
Hi guys!

This deck is perfect, Im using it to farm gold hunter, but I think it can be a good deck until rank 5, perhaps more.

Hunter midrange

Winrate

Greetings.
Used this deck at the end of last season thanks gozadera for the preview :) here's a breakdown of win-rate per rank:
13 54%
12 67%
11 100%
10 60%
9 49%
8 47%
7 75%
6 61%
5 48%

oijkn
#7 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 4:58:20 PM(UTC)
oijkn


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 472
Man
Location: 127.0.0.1

Thanks: 76 times
Was thanked: 271 time(s) in 93 post(s)
I will give it a try :) thank you for sharing !
marcos0100
#8 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:30:44 PM(UTC)
marcos0100


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 30
Man
Location: NA Server

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Is there any mulligan/combo for this deck or the best so far is the default?
Psyrodon
#9 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 7:06:41 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 53

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
rly nice deck.i will try,

can u tell me what i can take 4 Dr boom? dint got em...
Rudetski
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 3, 2015 8:56:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 19

Thanks: 14 times
Psyrodon;32086 wrote:
rly nice deck.i will try,

can u tell me what i can take 4 Dr boom? dint got em...


Maybe Sylvanas Windrunner if you really want to use a legend? Leroy Jenkins? Kel'Thuzad could even work. Or if you want an epic how about the Kodo Rider, if that works for silverfish.
marcos0100
#11 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 12:22:03 AM(UTC)
marcos0100


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 30
Man
Location: NA Server

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Just passing by to thank for the deck, left the bot for some hours playing it, it played 36 games(I know it's not much for a solid win rate %) and it got 28-6. 36 Might not be much, but if you know a minimum of standard deviation you know that 82.4% on a sample of 36 is a pretty good outcome.



Great deck.

Btw, default settings, no mulligans or combos, all staying around rank 19~18. Games are really fast, 28 wins in 240 minutes, 7 wins per hour, can get Golden Portrait in less than 3 days with this.

Pretty solid match up against other hunters, mages and priests, against warlocks is also really good. Not enough games against the others to talk about...
Psyrodon
#12 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 2:14:36 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 53

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)


just dont get dr boom. i place with kel.
i am on rang 19-17
useing siverfish - default control
luffyDmonkey
#13 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 3:06:32 AM(UTC)
luffyDmonkey


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 94
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Psyrodon;32094 wrote:


just dont get dr boom. i place with kel.
i am on rang 19-17
useing siverfish - default control

i think behave= rush; works better.
Psyrodon
#14 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 3:43:02 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 53

Thanks: 41 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
luffyDmonkey;32096 wrote:
i think behave= rush; works better.


i will give a try. ty buddy
Snowman79
#15 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:13:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

For some reason this deck didn't work for me, started from R14 ended up R16. Played total of 41 games, won 16 of them, so around 39% winrate. I used silver.dll and default setup.
luffyDmonkey
#16 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:27:01 PM(UTC)
luffyDmonkey


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 94
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Snowman79;32110 wrote:
For some reason this deck didn't work for me, started from R14 ended up R16. Played total of 41 games, won 16 of them, so around 39% winrate. I used silver.dll and default setup.

i think this is because its not a easy deck to play
Snowman79
#17 Posted : Wednesday, November 4, 2015 2:17:35 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

luffyDmonkey;32113 wrote:
i think this is because its not a easy deck to play


Erm, I could take that comment if it was manually played but if some ppl get like 70-80% winrates and some get sub 40% and it's same bot we use, doesnt make sense to me.
marcos0100
#18 Posted : Thursday, November 5, 2015 12:42:55 AM(UTC)
marcos0100


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 30
Man
Location: NA Server

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 8 post(s)
I have been using the deck card by card on default and the win rate is steady between 75% and 85% as I check it from time to time. It was 85% but fell a little as I removed the setting to stay on rank 18- and let it rank up. I got to rank 14 and the win rate is still over 75%.

Pretty great match up against other hunters(10-0) and priests(7-0), but the deck is really struggling against this secret paladin meta (2-5).



@luffyDmonkey

You said it could work better on rush instead of default, but I disagree, got it on rush overnight once and it got a win rate of 67,9%, on default on one night had a win rate of 78,7%. The rush had a little bit more games played, but the total amount of wins were bigger on default because the games were not fast enough on rush to compensate for the 9,8% difference on win rate.

@Psyrodon

Kel would be great for a player using the deck, but the bot usually use small minions to go face rather than trading, it doesn't understand the Kel mechanics really well to make a good use of it. I think another legendary, more brute force, could be better. Ragnaros, Sneed, King Crush, Ysera, maybe even a Gruul... But Dr. Balanced is definitely the best, the value is just too amazing. Maybe the pair Feugen and Stalagg could work, replacing Boom and another one, but you would need both, it would be too situational, wouldn't help most part of the times, it's too easily countered by players and it would be necessary to remove something else, and I don't think there's anything removable in the deck. I would just suggest something like a King of Beasts.
1 user thanked marcos0100 for this useful post.
Psyrodon on 11/5/2015(UTC)
luffyDmonkey
#19 Posted : Thursday, November 5, 2015 3:20:22 AM(UTC)
luffyDmonkey


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 94
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 13 post(s)
marcos0100;32124 wrote:

@luffyDmonkey

You said it could work better on rush instead of default, but I disagree, got it on rush overnight once and it got a win rate of 67,9%, on default on one night had a win rate of 78,7%. The rush had a little bit more games played, but the total amount of wins were bigger on default because the games were not fast enough on rush to compensate for the 9,8% difference on win rate.


mhh nice ill try control then
BlackOak
#20 Posted : Thursday, November 5, 2015 7:31:57 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
I've had several PM's requesting the setting I used. You'll find my data sets here the actual set I used was Hunter(Mid-Range)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.131 seconds.