Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages<123>
Achieved Legendary.
Quicksilver
#33 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:52:09 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

Thanks: 1 times
Hello Xixis,
I was wondering how many of the classes did you rewrite?
I am assuming you wrote your own behaviour and adjusted the mulligan file. Anything else i have to look into?
Also, do you think that the default AI with custom deckrules can achieve similar results?
Greetings Q
Xixis
#34 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:09:07 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Scotland

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Quicksilver;29821 wrote:
Hello Xixis,
I was wondering how many of the classes did you rewrite?
I am assuming you wrote your own behaviour and adjusted the mulligan file. Anything else i have to look into?
Also, do you think that the default AI with custom deckrules can achieve similar results?
Greetings Q

You can't use the default AI, too many issues which can't be solved.
Xixis
#21 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:11:03 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Scotland

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 7 post(s)
acheron55;29796 wrote:
you spent 30 hours to do what in silverfish, writing mulligan lol?

No. Mulligan took around 3 hours, the rest was coding rules and editing silver AI
1 user thanked Xixis for this useful post.
OverStriker on 9/24/2015(UTC)
Xixis
#24 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:13:01 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Scotland

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 7 post(s)
gatomiaurex;29797 wrote:
No pictures from the deck, no bot stats, no other image to prove he got legend other than those two...

I don't know, this post just seems a little fishy and more like a call for attention.

Anyways, if you did get legend with the bot, congrats! But i doubt the account will survive the next ban wave, people who knows how the bot plays and actually have more than one neuron on their heads so they know how to report you are below rank 7-.

Winrate was 58% over 600+ games
I was using silver AI and not tracking stats
OverStriker
#22 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:13:02 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 7
Location: brazil

Thanks: 1 times
Xixis;29828 wrote:
No. Mulligan took around 3 hours, the rest was coding rules and editing silver AI



Can you "give" your settings to us please? *-*
emilcoff
#35 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:44:23 AM(UTC)
emilcoff


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116
Location: Argentina

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Congrats xixis such skills at coding. Im a never legend rank 5 guy x(
gatomiaurex
#25 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:02:15 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 140

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Xixis;29829 wrote:
Winrate was 58% over 600+ games
I was using silver AI and not tracking stats


That's odd, the bot automatically tracks the stats.

Xixis
#26 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:40:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Scotland

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 7 post(s)
gatomiaurex;29857 wrote:
That's odd, the bot automatically tracks the stats.


I used silver not the default bot.
OverStriker
#31 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:51:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 7
Location: brazil

Thanks: 1 times
Xixis;29867 wrote:
I used silver not the default bot.



Can you give your silver man? please
omerhayyam
#27 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:08:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Xixis;29867 wrote:
I used silver not the default bot.


It doesnt matter what you used. HR keeps your statistic for all of your decks and games. Can you show us, so we can see what kinda winrate you have against other classes.
Ultranist
#36 Posted : Thursday, September 24, 2015 8:24:26 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 19
Location: XXX

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I really hate this showoff threads >.<

not everyone can code you know
nevergoingback
#37 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 2:02:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 20

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
and that's all this really is, a bragging thread. Couldn't you have done that on a more legitimate site?

If your trying to validate the bot can reach legend with custom rules, we already knew that, said it almost a year ago (different account)

I don't get it, seems deep down you really want to share with your community, unless your trying to sell something?

BlackOak
#38 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 4:27:26 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Xixis;29765 wrote:

DECKLIST :
1x Hunter's Mark
1x Webspinner
1x Bear Trap
1x Flare
1x Freezing Trap
1x Quick Shot
1x Snake Trap
2x Haunted Creeper
1x Ironbeak Owl
2x Knife Juggler
2x Mad Scientist
2x Eaglehorn Bow
2x Animal Companion
2x Kill Command
2x Unleash the hounds
2x Hound Master
1x Piloted Shredder
1x Loatheb
1x Sludge Belcher
2x Savannah Highmane
1x Dr Boom

@Xixis Nice work shows that botting can produce the right results. It would be nice to share your finding with botmaker & joyadmin even if your not willing to show the rest of us :)

Hi Everyone,
I can understand people being guarded about providing their files/settings, It does take time, personally over that last few weeks I have spend 4-6hours a day watching bot/editing rules & settings. It is time consuming, so please don't slate people for not sharing if that is their will. But we are a community and we should share our findings for the betterment of botting.

Anyway I will add a set of mulligan rules to my _mulligan.txt thread for this deck. I may find it harder to write the _combo.txt though (can someone PM me a _combo.txt that works even a basic one?).
anax
#39 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 6:08:20 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 77

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 36 time(s) in 17 post(s)
@BlackOak
i will send a PM, found recently.
1 user thanked anax for this useful post.
BlackOak on 9/25/2015(UTC)
Xixis
#28 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 7:19:02 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Scotland

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 7 post(s)
omerhayyam;29869 wrote:
It doesnt matter what you used. HR keeps your statistic for all of your decks and games. Can you show us, so we can see what kinda winrate you have against other classes.

HR was never used only a standalone version of silver.
BlackOak
#30 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 7:29:54 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Xixis;29894 wrote:
HR was never used only a standalone version of silver.
In that case I'm a bit confused, if you didn't use HR then why post on the HR forum?
nevergoingback
#40 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 8:30:49 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 20

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
as I said before if he wanted to protect the information he wouldn't have posted here in the first place, if he doesn't plan on sharing the information, he is either trolling or starved for attention,

@Botmaker
Could you maybe look at the card "Bolster" I have been trying to work it into a deck, but the bot the bot does not ever seem to play it even when can clearly create a game winning advantage.

Thanks!
1 user thanked nevergoingback for this useful post.
BlackOak on 9/25/2015(UTC)
BlackOak
#41 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 8:44:52 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Hi everyone,

tweaked hunter in mulligan here
1 user thanked BlackOak for this useful post.
Ultranist on 9/25/2015(UTC)
BlackOak
#42 Posted : Friday, September 25, 2015 8:56:38 AM(UTC)
BlackOak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 253
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 196 time(s) in 65 post(s)
Hi everyone,
Just did a run of 20 games in casual mode using my _mulligan.txt and this deck.

Normally I would do a 50 game run but since posting my version of mulligan, I've had a lot of interest in my work :) and therefore less testing time.

Total: 13-7 (65% win-rate)
Druid: 2-0
Hunter: 1-1
Mage: 1-1
Paladin: 3-2
Priest: 1-2
Shaman: 1-0
Warlock: 0-1
Warrior:2-0
2 users thanked BlackOak for this useful post.
Xixis on 9/25/2015(UTC), Oridian on 9/27/2015(UTC)
Oridian
#43 Posted : Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:09:10 AM(UTC)
Oridian

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8
Man
Location: UK

Thanks: 7 times
I just love bragging threads.
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.174 seconds.