Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
16 Pages«<1213141516>
Board Control Rule Set (17-May-2015)
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
one-i
#265 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 1:25:59 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 13

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
It's my first time going through the rules, so I may be wrong here, but...

If I'm reading this right: under gameplayrules > Paladin, you have muster for battle 'gain for cast' as long as there is ~no~ knife juggler on the board?

should't that be the other way around?
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked one-i for this useful post.
Yoin on 5/11/2015(UTC)
generalming
#267 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 3:05:43 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1
warlock wont use darkbomb
Back to top
WWW
Yoin
#268 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 10:29:00 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
generalming;25833 wrote:
warlock wont use darkbomb

I've noticed too. Maybe a problem with default AI. Does someone notice it when he/she is using default AI?

Added rule for Blackwing Technician. It will have priority if you have a dragon in your hand.
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
Yoin
#266 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 10:32:45 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
one-i;25830 wrote:
It's my first time going through the rules, so I may be wrong here, but...

If I'm reading this right: under gameplayrules > Paladin, you have muster for battle 'gain for cast' as long as there is ~no~ knife juggler on the board?

should't that be the other way around?

Yes, you are right. Fixed
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
TechnoKing
#269 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 4:54:43 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 59

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Hey Yoin thanks for the deck rules how would I go about setting a rule that would allow me to keep a specific card only if I was playing second? thanks!
Back to top
WWW
Yoin
#270 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 6:07:48 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
TechnoKing;25851 wrote:
Hey Yoin thanks for the deck rules how would I go about setting a rule that would allow me to keep a specific card only if I was playing second? thanks!

You can use the condition "with coin" ("Without coin" for opposite)

Example:

Name card Keep it With coin
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Yoin for this useful post.
TechnoKing on 5/13/2015(UTC)
TechnoKing
#271 Posted : Monday, May 11, 2015 11:15:04 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 59

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Yoin;25856 wrote:
You can use the condition "with coin" ("Without coin" for opposite)

Example:

Name card Keep it With coin


okay i'll try that thanks! in the meantime I tried to do something like:

Name Card Keep It If other cards contains $(The Coin)

But I don't think that works can't tell for sure as the condition never came up in recent games but I appreciate the effort you've put in, the updates and sharing with the community thanks Yoin!
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked TechnoKing for this useful post.
Yoin on 5/12/2015(UTC)
plookey78
#272 Posted : Tuesday, May 12, 2015 5:30:28 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 20
Location: Lithuania

Thanks: 4 times
hey yoin. I was wondering if there is something like "none of my battlefield minions are $keyword" or some way you can make it.
Back to top
WWW
Yoin
#273 Posted : Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:48:51 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
plookey78;25866 wrote:
hey yoin. I was wondering if there is something like "none of my battlefield minions are $keyword" or some way you can make it.

You have this two options:

some of my battlefield minions are not $keyword

and the keyword are $damaged,$enraged,$exhausted,$frozen,$immune,$poisonous,$silenced,$spell,$stealthed,$murloc,$beast,$totem,$pirate,$demon,$dragon,$number

or

some of my battlefield minions have no $keyword

Again keyword are: $battlecry,$charge,$combo,$deathrattle,$divineshield,$enrage,$overload,$silence,$spellpower,$taunt,$windfury,$ability,$number

Check my rules/other member rules for examples ;)
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
plookey78
#274 Posted : Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:03:00 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 20
Location: Lithuania

Thanks: 4 times
"some of my battlefield minions are not $Mech" seems not to work. Im trying to make bot not to play goblin blastmage when there is no mech on battlefield and there is piloted shredder in hand, whitch is more valuable to play on its own. Btw I watched a game where bot with 2 hp was against hunter with 6 hp and explosive trap active, and bot failed to fireball him and killed himself by attacking first >_<
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Yoin
#275 Posted : Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:14:11 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
plookey78;25916 wrote:
"some of my battlefield minions are not $Mech" seems not to work. Im trying to make bot not to play goblin blastmage when there is no mech on battlefield and there is piloted shredder in hand, whitch is more valuable to play on its own.


You can use this:

one of my battlefield minions is (no) $mech
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
lord666
#276 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 5:08:51 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 16

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
hello,
I would add rule but I don't know how.
If the Bot plays on the same turn the "Flamewalker" and one Spell,
I would force him to play first the "Flamewalker" for benefit the 2 additional DAMAGE
Actualy the Bot play the Spell First ..
Back to top
WWW
Yoin
#277 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 7:29:30 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
When i'll arrive to my home, I'll write both card rules and add them to my rules. I will not force the bot to not play the cards, but I hope that if the bot has the cards and enough mana, the order would be OK.
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Yoin for this useful post.
lord666 on 5/14/2015(UTC)
Yoin
#278 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:02:14 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
Added rules for:

Goblin blastmage. Now the AI will try to cast it if you have a mech into the battlefield, but the Ai will also cast it if its needed and you don't have a mech into play.

Flamewalker: If you have at least one spell in your hand, the bot would play it before to cast the spells

Both cards must be tested intensively to attune the gain action value. So feedback is welcomed.
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
2 users thanked Yoin for this useful post.
lord666 on 5/14/2015(UTC), TechnoKing on 5/14/2015(UTC)
lord666
#279 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:28:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 16

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
thank... i test it :D

edit:
Outch don't work ... ERROR

GamePlayRule Row: [121] unknown card name -Flamewalker
GamePlayRule Row: [128] error: unknown rule condition - one of my battlefield minions is no
GamePlayRule Row: [128] no conditions found



oh i don't know if you see my message in other post
about priest rule...
a little problem
"Holy Smite" target enemy only if health<=2
the problem is ... if you have 2 x "Holy smite" in your hand and Enemy 4 life ... 2deg+2deg = 4deg ... you win ...But don't ... the rule is " if Enemy <=2 " ...the bot don't target Enemy .. -_-'

i think ADD .... Holy Smite target enemy if health<="4" and some of my hand cards are "Holy Smite" ??

i think that after see your modif for "Flamewalker" ..
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
1 user thanked lord666 for this useful post.
Yoin on 5/14/2015(UTC)
Yoin
#280 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:59:34 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
Flamewaker had a typo. Easy to fix.

I've added more rules for Holy Smite
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
lord666
#281 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 4:21:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 16

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
thank
and thank for holy smite

i find other problem
you must do add this at the end ... "and $number>=1"

Flamwaker ...... some of my hand cards are $spell and $number>=1

and for
Goblin Blastmage ... the rule don't know $mech ... that var don't exist in rule :(
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
1 user thanked lord666 for this useful post.
Yoin on 5/14/2015(UTC)
Yoin
#282 Posted : Thursday, May 14, 2015 5:40:46 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 583
Location: Spain

Thanks: 118 times
Was thanked: 218 time(s) in 108 post(s)
Now it would work OK ;)

I've could test the file in the bot and the rules are loaded without problems
My Control rules: here.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Yoin for this useful post.
lord666 on 5/15/2015(UTC)
lord666
#283 Posted : Friday, May 15, 2015 3:57:36 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 16

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
yes, now HearthRanger no longer displays an error, (i think yesterday the problem was coming from the update of Hearthstone)
but if you throw the "Deck Rule debugger" you will see that the rule is not considered because it generates an error on start
Back to top
WWW
one-i
#284 Posted : Friday, May 15, 2015 12:26:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 13

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I noticed that my druid kept swipe during the mulligan against a mage. When I looked at the rules it says to only keet it against $hunter and $warlock.

Will adding a rule prior saying to discard it fix the situation?
Back to top
WWW
16 Pages«<1213141516>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.980 seconds.