Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
[Vision AI] Ailma HearthRanger Decks - Witchwood Expansion
Ailma
#1 Posted : Wednesday, May 16, 2018 5:20:46 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Hi guys ,
Im Ailma and I want to contribute my knowledge to this community.
For the last 2 years I have been using this bot to farm gold and get R5 quickly month after month.
Thanks to all the developers that have made my way possible here.
Now it seems that with the march of the great geniuses, it is up to us to get to work in new configurations to continue reaching rank 5.

Please, if you think there are any cards with high possibilities send me a PM, explaining initial ideas, mulligan and combos to create a starter edition, from that point we can improve it for the community

Please try to understand that it takes time to get a consistent deck. And the most important thing for developers is to gather information about what is wrong with each deck.


------------------------------------- LIST OF DECKS -------------------------------

  • Murloc Paladin

https://www.dropbox.com/...JiLhNU7EymIULQfiRa?dl=0



  • Odd Rogue

https://www.dropbox.com/...XTpu-aSMA_QywPHu0a?dl=0


  • Spiteful Druid

https://www.dropbox.com/...X0SKQutsnMO0RJ90va?dl=0
13 users thanked Ailma for this useful post.
Habanero on 5/16/2018(UTC), allhearth001 on 5/16/2018(UTC), phelon on 5/16/2018(UTC), jquema1 on 5/18/2018(UTC), zenkarus on 6/2/2018(UTC), DropDeadGorgeous on 6/3/2018(UTC), Totolitoto on 6/4/2018(UTC), Twister on 6/5/2018(UTC), CCobram on 6/7/2018(UTC), Syufeng on 6/12/2018(UTC), dothedance on 6/23/2018(UTC), iffytiffy on 6/25/2018(UTC), Zug on 4/10/2019(UTC)
Habanero
#2 Posted : Wednesday, May 16, 2018 5:46:32 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Thanks for your work, i can do some tests in the weekend if you want, reached rank 6 with Ljsac old murloc paladin config.
1 user thanked Habanero for this useful post.
allhearth001 on 5/16/2018(UTC)
allhearth001
#3 Posted : Wednesday, May 16, 2018 6:19:58 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 40

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Thanks for the hard work and contribution! Much love!

Haven't ran paladin in a while just going for goldens now. i'll test it out though!
int69x
#4 Posted : Thursday, May 17, 2018 6:16:10 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 27
Location: Belgium

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Hello thank's you for sharing! But i got a little bit problem :p

Load error on GlobalValues.json

Any1 can help me? http://prntscr.com/jiywdx
Ailma
#5 Posted : Thursday, May 17, 2018 6:54:55 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
int69x;56352 wrote:
Hello thank's you for sharing! But i got a little bit problem :p

Load error on GlobalValues.json

Any1 can help me? http://prntscr.com/jiywdx



The error is syntax, as soon as I can upload a corrected version.

It is not a vital file, you can omit its use or replace the content by the following:

{
"GameCardId":"GlobalValues",
"ConfigComment":"This is a special card for setup global values",

"GlobalDivineShield":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"2.74",
}
],
},

"GlobalDurability":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.22",
}
],
},

"GlobalStealth":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.21",
}
],
},

"GlobalHeroAttack":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.81",
}
],
},
"GlobalMinionAttack":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.81",
}
],
},

"GlobalWeaponAttack":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.14",
}
],
},

"GlobalTaunt":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.02",
}
],
},
"GlobalOverload":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.68",
}
],
},
"GlobalFrozen":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"2.04",
}
],
},
"GlobalWindfury":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.96",
}
],
},
"GlobalHeroHealth":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.14",
}
],
},
"GlobalMinionHealth":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.14",
}
],
},
"GlobalCharge":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.65",
}
],
},
"GlobalMinionIntrinsicValue":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"3.32+2",
}
],
},








"OppGlobalDivineShield":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"2.74",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalDurability":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.22",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalStealth":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.21",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalHeroAttack":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.14",
}
],
},
"OppGlobalMinionAttack":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.14",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalWeaponAttack":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.14",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalTaunt":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.02",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalOverload":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"1.68",
}
],
},

"OppGlobalFrozen":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"2.04",
}
],
},
"OppGlobalWindfury":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.96",
}
],
},
"OppGlobalHeroHealth":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.81",
}
],
},
"OppGlobalMinionHealth":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.81",
}
],
},
"OppGlobalCharge":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"0.65",
}
],
},
"OppGlobalMinionIntrinsicValue":
{
"values":
[
{
"condition": "*",
"value":"3.32+5",
}
],
},




}
atyys
#6 Posted : Thursday, May 17, 2018 8:51:41 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Hello, just tryied this deck over night in EU. Here is result. Started at rank 20 ended rank 17

Ailma
#7 Posted : Thursday, May 17, 2018 9:13:26 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
atyys;56354 wrote:
Hello, just tryied this deck over night in EU. Here is result. Started at rank 20 ended rank 17




THE WR is fine, even though it's not fantastic.

If you want you can check the games against witch // shaman, if you see configuration errors comment them.
If you see that they are actions of the bot itself you can report them from the bot itself.

I dont know what decks are those confrontations (warlock // shaman), but maybe it's the AOE + Curations that make a low WR against those classes.

All help is welcome .............
kamil234
#10 Posted : Thursday, May 17, 2018 9:21:54 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 20 post(s)
its probably safe to assume its cube lock. The only answer this deck has is 2x spellbreaker vs void lords, but no equality/consecrate/avenging wrath/ other AOE options. It relies on board pressure and card draw from divine favor.

In most cases, if its turn 6 or higher vs warlock, this deck has low chance of winning. (especially if they equip skull of manari)

with mulligan, vs warlock, i recommend to hold blessing of kings. If you dont have call to arms on 4, blessing of kings helps alot since warlock cant deal with big minion early game, unless they upgraded their spellstone.

I will try this deck out in a few days. Still trying to see more statistic for my even paladin

Also, i would consider 56%WR really, really good. (in ranked)
Ailma
#11 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 12:54:39 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
2 new Decks:

- SpiteFul Druid
- Odd Rogue

You can see and and download configurations in the first post
1 user thanked Ailma for this useful post.
dothedance on 6/23/2018(UTC)
kratoscoc
#8 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 1:20:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Ailma;56355 wrote:
THE WR is fine, even though it's not fantastic.

If you want you can check the games against witch // shaman, if you see configuration errors comment them.
If you see that they are actions of the bot itself you can report them from the bot itself.

I dont know what decks are those confrontations (warlock // shaman), but maybe it's the AOE + Curations that make a low WR against those classes.

All help is welcome .............



Bro where can I found all Cards Codes to use them in the configss files ? Want to build my own config file.
Ailma
#9 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 3:27:07 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
kratoscoc;56512 wrote:
Bro where can I found all Cards Codes to use them in the configss files ? Want to build my own config file.



I use this website, I suppose there will be many other sites

http://metastats.net/allcards/
jquema1
#12 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 3:37:46 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Odd rogue didnt win a single game in 12 matches. I decided to stop using it. Didnt watch for misplays.
Ailma
#13 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 4:33:10 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
jquema1;56515 wrote:
Odd rogue didnt win a single game in 12 matches. I decided to stop using it. Didnt watch for misplays.



if you do not look at mistakes it is not helpful.If you want to contribute, check the games you lose, report the logic errors from the bot and the configuration here or by PM.

The bot makes hundreds of bad decisions because of the way it plays cards. The json only define guidelines on how certain cards should be used.
Since the last expansion there is no deck that can assure you a good WR, the best that I have achieved is 45-48% if you are lucky in a winning streak it takes you from 15-10-5, but dont expect to get anything positive without testing the decks.

jquema1
#14 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 4:45:59 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Ailma;56516 wrote:
if you do not look at mistakes it is not helpful.If you want to contribute, check the games you lose, report the logic errors from the bot and the configuration here or by PM.

The bot makes hundreds of bad decisions because of the way it plays cards. The json only define guidelines on how certain cards should be used.
Since the last expansion there is no deck that can assure you a good WR, the best that I have achieved is 45-48% if you are lucky in a winning streak it takes you from 15-10-5, but dont expect to get anything positive without testing the decks.




It could be the deck itself. Will try it in unranked tomorrow for a couple of games.
zenkarus
#15 Posted : Saturday, June 2, 2018 5:16:01 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 4 times
Testing out Murloc Paladin, gonna leave it overnight. Will post results later.

EDIT:

Bot crashed overnight, this is what I got. Started at Rank 13 and went down to Rank 15. Americas server, SEA region playing at 3am - 6am
Ailma
#16 Posted : Sunday, June 3, 2018 8:39:19 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
zenkarus;56518 wrote:
Testing out Murloc Paladin, gonna leave it overnight. Will post results later.

EDIT:

Bot crashed overnight, this is what I got. Started at Rank 13 and went down to Rank 15. Americas server, SEA region playing at 3am - 6am


have you been able to check the defeats?
Any configuration error in the configuration?


Twister
#17 Posted : Monday, June 4, 2018 9:21:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 27

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
It seems to me all dropbox links to the config files are dead?
Ailma
#18 Posted : Tuesday, June 5, 2018 3:39:10 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Twister;56540 wrote:
It seems to me all dropbox links to the config files are dead?



links OK
Twister
#19 Posted : Tuesday, June 5, 2018 9:18:46 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 27

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Hmm.. strange. They're indeed ok now. When i wrote that i had recieved a dropbox custom 404 error site, that stated that the files couldn't be found or the owner might have removed them.

Whatever, i started testing with OddRouge now and will report back later.
Twister
#20 Posted : Tuesday, June 5, 2018 1:45:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 27

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Standard ranked EU - started at rank 20


I know that this is not much data and not enough to be relevant from a statistical point of view, but there are several misplays already which lead to the underwhelming results. I included (and renamed) some of the review files to debug in this zipfile: https://www.dropbox.com/...98g1qf/Reviews.zip?dl=0



Misplays i saw:
  • - Bot never plays Deadly Poison

  • - Doesn't use dagger enough.
    Plays and and sometimes even trades with minions instead.

  • - Doesn't redagger when there is a charge left and ends the turn with 2+ mana.

  • - Plays Hench Clan Thug after attacking with dagger.

  • - Plays minions before triggering Explosive trap.
    Don't think that this will be fixable by config though, as i haven't seen any decks doing well against secrets in general.

  • - And a weird one, where the bot skips every turn because it can't calculate any results.
    Included the replay file in the zip, but i already reported the turns with the debugger since it's the same strange behavior with the default config.
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.254 seconds.